Joe Biden inexplicably gave a statement today telling the world what the “right verdict” is in the trial of Derek Chauvin.
Having a sitting president opine on what “the right” verdict is in a trial prior to the verdict being issued is an obvious ground for appeal for Chauvin. He has tainted this jury and any future jury that has access to YouTube.
In a constitutional world, Chauvin would easily win that appeal given the overwhelmingly biased circumstances–regardless of whether he committed the crimes for which is he is accused. That’s how rule of law works, regardless of race.
This has led many rational and logical and ethical people to believe this was an attempt to intimidate and extort the jury while virtue signaling to the irrational ‘critical race theory’ base of the Democrat party. By telling people what to believe about a trial, it would convince others to believe the same way. It would also embolden violent criminals to take action against a verdict that did not agree with Biden.
Others wonder if–knowing the obvious repercussions of this statement–Joe Biden’s was intentionally tainting the jury in case they did convict Chauvin. This would allow Chauvin to begin the appeals process easily. This would allow unrest to continue beyond the first trial and perpetuate unending unrest and division in America.
Such unrest would help overwhelm the system more quickly, making it much more easy to collapse as people remain constantly fearful and emotional, and less logical and rational. It would also distract from other much more important national issues that are much more worrisome for America’s future than the trial of one man.
Watch for yourself and decide.
Biden just gave Chauvin’s lawyers grounds for an appeal. In addition to all the other shit stupid Democrat politicians have been saying. https://t.co/WnrkehGD6o
— Ian Miles Cheong (@stillgray) April 20, 2021
Why would a sitting president inject himself into a trial, thereby subverting due process by tainting the media, jury, and public opinion? Where on Earth could Chauvin possibly get an unbiased trial, now that the President of the United States has already made his judgement to the country on the matter, publicly?
ARTICLE SOURCE: 100percentfeedup.com