Dem lawmakers are pushing the Equal Rights Amendment (ERA) but Republicans argue it is “unnecessary” and “redundant.” The messaging is also a bit confusing when you add in the push for transgender women.
The Democratic-controlled House of Representatives voted on Wednesday to remove a decades-old deadline for adopting the ERA, in hopes of formally “protecting women’s rights in the U.S. Constitution.”
Congress approved the ERA in the early 1970s and set a 1982 deadline for it to be enacted if 38 state legislatures voted to approve. Last year, Virginia became the 38th state to vote in favor and along with Illinois and Nevada went to federal court in Washington, D.C. to demand the amendment be declared valid.
The proposal faces an uphill battle in the 505-50 split Senate between Democrats and Republicans, where Democrats would need a supermajority of 60 votes for passage. The issue is also in the federal courts, and could be headed to the Supreme Court.
The House voted 222-204, largely along party lines, to remove the deadline for states to ratify the amendment.
Stop the censors, sign up to get today’s top stories delivered right to your inbox
The amendment states in part: “Equality of rights under the law shall not be abridged by the United States or any state on account of sex.”
House Speaker Nancy Pelosi declared the amendment was still needed. “This is the daily reality for American women who face inequality and injustice for so many arenas of life, from a massive wage gap, to pregnancy discrimination, to sexual harassment in the workplace, to economic disparities that have worsened during the coronavirus,” she said during debate.
Liberal activists say American women still suffer discrimination 100 years after winning the right to vote, noting studies showing they are routinely paid less than men for same work.
Republican Representative Michelle Fischbach argued that men and women are already equal under the Constitution.
Do you think the ERA should be adopted into the constitution?t
0% (0 Votes)
0% (0 Votes)
“To me the ERA is unnecessary, redundant and divisive,” Fischbach said. She said that if it became law, the amendment could also be used by pro-abortion groups to bolster abortion rights through the courts.
And then there is the usual Republican supporter or all things liberal, Senator Lisa Murkowski.
“I wish I could tell you that we have more Republican support for that at this time,” Murkowski, told reporters Tuesday. “We continue to work that.”
It is difficult to know where Democrats really stand on women’s rights as they push the transgender movement which seems to want to erase biological women as they support transgender women to be treated the same in sports and to normalize transgender men to have babies and nurse babies.
The House on Wednesday was also considering the Violence against Women Act, a law that strengthens domestic violence protections for women. It was originally sponsored in 1994 by then-Senator, now-President Joe Biden, but expired in 2019, and Biden campaigned on renewing it.
Republicans, including some who backed the law in the past, complained Democrats were seeking to expand the act by allowing shelters to take in transgender women.
In the end, it is all for show with little to no actual benefit for women.
Reuters contributed to this report.
Article Source : thefederalistpapers.org